About Me

Name:The New THOMA$ REPORT
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Search

Search

Ricky Martin "Endorses" Hillary"

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Saturday, May 31, 2008 4:13:32 PM
So what? Who cares what "rock stars" think? Does being a rock star confer on them any special knowledge? I don't think so. Most of them can't sing, anyway, and their chief "talent" is in convincing young, impressionable teenagers that they can. My guess is that this "endorsement" was made as a publicity stunt to get him some "press" and restart his flagging career. (Just common sense)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Next Supreme Court Justice

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Saturday, May 31, 2008 4:09:57 PM
The lists I've seen of people who are being seriously considered for nomination to the Supreme Court of the United States frighten me. The president doesn't matter as much, except he/she gets to nominate the next Supreme Court Justice. But, once confirmed the new justice can't be removed, unless he/she commits a terrible crime (as defined by Congress and the president). Major crimes committed by their decisions don't count. If they decide something based on their own personal opinions and biases rather than on the Constitution, as they are directed to do, the only thing that can happen is for Congress to reverse them--which ain't gonna happen easily with all the liberals lurking there. One such is Janet Reno, the "Butcher of Waco," and the woman who sent an innocent 6-year-old back to Cuba to communist slavery, even though the situation wasn't even any of her business. The kinds of decisions she would make as Justice really make me want to barf all over this keyboard.

How ANYBODY with any brains at all could seriously consider this woman as a Supreme Court Justice, I don't know. But a résumé like hers makes her a "good choice" for liberals, most of which don't have any brains. Then there is Democrat Sen. Patrick (Leaky) Leahy, who lost the chairmanship of one committee because he couldn't keep his mouth shut about national security secrets; Democrat Socialist Sen. Diane Feinstein, who waved around a loaded machine gun in an "anti-gun" rally, not knowing it was nothing like what she was promoting the banning thereof. There are many bad choices, most of which are high on the Democrats' lists to replace one of four Justices old enough to retire any time. John Paul Stevens, who is 88 years old, to old to be making the decisions required of a Supreme Court Justice; Ruth Bader Ginsberg, appointed by liberal Bill Clinton, who has already had a serious bout with cancer; Antonin Scalia, who is 72 (one year older than I am and I wouldn't even consider taking that job because of my age); and Anthony Kennedy, the same age. The Supreme Court is "supremely important" in our lives, as witness the millions of dead babies caused by the "Roe v. Wade" decision and the other tragedies caused by liberal votes. The next Supreme Court nominee is of vital importance to you and I. Don't let a liberal like Hillary or Obama make it. Another horrible thought: What if either Obama or Hillary become president and nominate the other? Migawd! We'd be doomed! (Save The Court)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The "Coming Recession"

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Saturday, May 31, 2008 4:04:34 PM
Why, after all these years of economic boom, are we now afraid of a "recession? I heard a man the other day say, forget a "recession." We're in a "full-blown Depression." What ignorance that shows. That man isn't old enough to know what a depression is! Yet he's "spreading the word" that one is not only "coming," we're IN one now! Which is exactly what CREATES recessions and depressions. Not economic problems. People "spreading the word" about a "coming recession," plus the propaganda, day after day by liberals, will cause one to soon come into being. Especially now with the Democrats (liberals, socialists) in "power" in Congress and with the danger of having a liberal president after the next election. People are "scared to death" of a "new depression," something they haven't seen since about the time I was being born, mostly because of the tax cuts brought about by John Kennedy (before they killed him) and Ronald Reagan and in spite of eight years of Bill Clinton trying his best to destroy the economy as well as the military and the CIA, plus the four year disaster of the Jimmy Carter years. Yes, we may be "heading into a recession," but wouldn't be if the Democrats weren't "in charge" and threatening to be in charge of ALL THREE of the parts of government. If they make it, we'll be the next "Soviet Union" in the world. (MSN Money) 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Extorting "Big Oil" for Global Warming

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Friday, May 30, 2008 8:22:43 AM
The supporters of "man-made global warming" scam are suing "big oil" companies who put out information refuting their swindle to shut them up. They still think of it as "settled science," when it is far from that. There are THOUSANDS of eminent climate scientists who daily refute the false findings of the so-called "scientists" who are pushing this swindle. And that includes those idiots at National Center for Climate Research (NCAR) in "The People's Republic of Boulder," Colorado. One time I even saw a cutout of an article from more than twenty-five years ago about "global cooling" on their wall. Now these swindlers are resorting to deluded judges to promote their swindle against all truth by suing oil companies who don't agree and say so. The same lawyer who made himself a millionaire extorting "big smoke," is now suing "big oil," claiming it is a major contributor to "man-made global warming." Only one problem: There IS no man-made global warming." There never has been and never will. Climate change is CYCLICAL and periodically changes from warming to cooling--and there's nothing man can do to stop it, either way. There's also nothing man can do to CAUSE it. People who think so are "consummate jewels of ignorance." But that "works both ways." Now the founder of the Weather Channel advocates suing AlGore for foisting a swindle upon us to make him prove his allegations. Gore calls those who disagree with him "deniers," as if denying the existence of global warming is some kind of a "crime." Talk about desperation!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Forced to Carry "Carbon Ration Card"

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Friday, May 30, 2008 8:17:17 AM
Some ditzy politician in England has swallowed AlGore's "man-made global warming swindle" so much that he wants to FORCE every man, woman and child to carry and use a "carbon ration card" or not be able to buy gasoline, airline tickets, or household energy. Leave it to the politicians to find a way to profit from someone else's swindle. Guess where the money people will be FORCED to pay for these "carbon ration cards" will go. NO matter how many gyrations they go through to hide it, the money will be given to the politicians to play with. The "problem" is AlGore's "man-made global warming" swindle that Gore has "publicized" far and wide. The "solution" offered is "carbon ration cards" forced upon the population. The "Hegelian Principle" is alive and well. If you don't know what that is, ask me. (The London Daily Mail)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

What IS Socialism?

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Thursday, May 29, 2008 4:53:46 PM
Imagine my surprise when my own sister read the first few chapters of my new book, "What's WRONG In America" in manuscript form and asked me "What is socialism?" She said she became confused at all the "isms" I mentioned. I explained to her that socialism is just one form of collectivism, which is basically TAKING from those who EARN their way and GIVING that taken to those who DON'T. Their "mantra" is "From each according to his ability and to each according to his need, making "need" a DEMAND on the EARNINGS of those who can earn their own way. The major fight is between collectivism and individualism. Individualism is where a person earns his/her own way, and doesn't "need" anything from others. Looters can't stand this. They want others to "need" things, so they can use this "need" to gain their votes to gain and retain power over all of us.. I call these people the "moochers" (leeches) of society The "enablers" are the "looters" who to get themselves elected to positions of power over the rest of us, promise to TAKE from those who can, and will EARN, and "keep the goodies coming" so the "moochers" can live without having to work at anything except convincing the "looters" they are the most needy. Needless to say, she is now much more educated on "the ways of the world."  But that experience was, to me, an "epiphany." I had thought that EVERYONE knew what socialism was, and why it is EVIL. They do not. Which is why I wrote that book, which, if you read it all, does a good job of explaining just what socialism is. The book will be out very soon. It is being printed right now. I'll let you know where you can get it then. (Just common sense)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Hillary to Cry and Stomp Her Feet

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Thursday, May 29, 2008 4:37:31 PM
If she loses the nomination fight to Obama. She has already "vowed to fight to the end" if she loses the nomination she thought was hers for the asking. That's what babies do when disappointed in what they want. Throw a fit. From what I've heard, she's good at that. Advice for her "handlers:" When you come in to tell her "It's all over," make sure there are no ash trays within her reach, and that someone bigger than her is stationed at every  lamp, or she'll throw it. She doesn't know it, but it's already "all over." Even if she manages to steal it from Obama at the convention, there's no way she'll win the general election unless this nation is more ignorant than I thought. If it is,  I probably won't be around long enough to see the result. If you want America to be the new "Soviet Union," just vote for either  Hillary OR Obama. (Just common sense)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

You Can't Say That!"

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Thursday, May 29, 2008 4:11:50 PM
The liberals have a "growing list" of things WE "can't say" in debating them for the presidency. They've always had it, and have always attempted to control the very words we can use in opposing them. Where the hell do they get off trying to tell us we can't use certain words or refer to certain things, such as Obama's "elephant ears?" Or his socialism? Or his tendency to blab his way to stupidity? Obama is a "sock puppet" for "move0n.org" and its billionaire sponsor, who has funded many lying books, the latest one the "Big Lie" by Scott McClellan. We can't talk about Obama's wife, even as she slams this country over and over; We can't talk about his twenty-year pastor, who taught her to do so. Seems like we can't talk about ANYTHING that might hurt Obama's chances of conning his way into the presidency. "Political correctness" is a larger version of that, trying to DICTATE the very words we are "allowed" to use in the debate. I don't "buy it." I say what I mean and I don't use "weasel words." That gets me into trouble every so often, but I don't care. Truth is truth. If they want to "call me names" for telling it, so be it. (Ann Coulter)

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Kids Need to Experience Losing

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Thursday, May 29, 2008 4:08:41 PM
The trend today is to "protect" the "tender egos" of kids by not allowing them to lose at ANYTHING. They're playing sports and not keeping score so the losers "won't be hurt." What they haven't considered is that "real life" is going to teach them what it feels like to lose" very quickly, once they get out there. And if they haven't experienced it and overcome it before, they're going to be "in trouble." (Parenting and Child Health)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Book Burning?

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Wednesday, May 28, 2008 2:43:31 PM
It's pretty bad when a person can get in trouble in America for reading a book. "Last November, Keith Sampson, a college student, was found guilty of “racial harassment.” He’d been caught reading a book while on break from a part-time job with the school. Uh-oh. The book is titled Notre Dame vs. the Klan: How the Fighting Irish Defeated the Ku Klux Klan. It recounts a conflict between Irish Catholics and the Klan back in the 1920s. The book is clearly anti-Klan." But so what? Even if it were pro-Klan, what law was broken by his reading it on his own time? The "Affirmative Action Officer" said his reading of it is "racial harassment" without even talking to him or reading the book (Methinks this "affirmative Action Officer" has way too much time on his hands and is just LOOKING for "harassment." How can this be? Maybe if he paraded the book in front of a Klansman. But how does reading ANY book become "harassment" of ANYBODY? We're getting way stupid in our "political correctness" in this country. Pretty soon, they'll try and call this blog "political harassment." And they'd be right. But so far, there is no law against "political harassment," and they'd have to get rid of the First Amendment before such a law could even be made. Why is there even such a THING as an "Affirmative Action Officer?" I'd just "flip him the finger" and turn the page. Fortunately, the university (IUPUI, Indianapolis) finally came to its senses and reversed this "ruling." I think they ought to fire this "Affirmative Action Officer" and abolish his job. (Paul Jacob/Common Sense)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Interrupting McCain's Speech

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Wednesday, May 28, 2008 2:39:30 PM
On three occasions, idiots interrupted the speech being given in Colorado by presidential candidate Sen. John McCain, shouting stupidities right and left. Fortunately, on all three occasions, the secutiry was quick, removing them before they could be but a minor inconvenience, "laughed off" by the candidate. Why is it most of the "demonstrations" by stupid people like this happen at Republican speeches? Maybe it's because Republicans are too busy at their jobs and have no time to do things like this, while liberals, most of whom are unemployed or the children of the rich, do. What I'm wondering is how Hillary squirmed her picture into a story about McCain. I'm not a McCain (or an Obama or Hillary) supporter, but this seems "fishy" to me. (New York Times)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Democrats Still Just Don't Get It!

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Wednesday, May 28, 2008 2:36:43 PM
They're still mired in the inexplicable fantasy that Iraq has nothing to do with Islamic terrorism. Forget that Saddam was financing, housing, and training Islamic terrorists. That he even had an airplane body to use in training terrorists to take over planes in flight (and this was BEFORE 9/11!). Forget that he was paying the families of terrorist suicide bombers in Israel or wherever they blew themselves up $25,000 to do so. Liberals in this country and elsewhere still think Iraq is the ONLY country where Islamic terrorists didn't exist. Frankly, the biggest terrorist (at the time) in existence (after bin Laden, that is) was Saddam Hussein and the country that he ran was the biggest, most friendly place for terrorists to go and "feel safe" during his reign. On the other hand, his own citizens could not "feel safe" from his depredations, including "rape rooms" and false imprisonment and murder (which was called "executions"). Saddam was one more murderous dictator who NEEDED to be "taken down," for your safety and mine. It is noteworthy that Islamic terrorists chose Iraq as THE place to fight with the world, since our own liberals won't admit Iraq is, and has always been, a big part of the Islamic terrorism conspiracy. Iran is also, and should be the next country to be "liberated."  They claim that fighting us is the only reason terrorists can recruit, but they have been recruiting ignorant Muslims (those their rulers KEPT ignorant) for hundreds of years. They only began to "get traction" in their efforts when they started getting "oil money" from Saudi Arabia and other oil-rich Middle East countries who hated us, anyway. (Heritage Foundation)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Oil Prices Coming Down

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Tuesday, May 27, 2008 3:01:04 PM
Yes, the reduction in gasoline usage caused by drivers changing their ways (gasoline usage has gone down more than ever in the past) because of this artificially manufactured "oil crisis" is starting to cause oil prices to start in a downward direction, and some "experts" are now saying gasoline prices may not get to the predicted $5 a gallon this year. But I wouldn’t bet on prices ever getting back to the level where they were before this skyrocket began. That's not how they operate. I've been watching gasoline prices go up and down for a lot of years, and they NEVER get back to the prices that prevailed before they began to suddenly rise. They always rise to an unnecessarily high level, and people, while whining about it, pay the price for a while. Then when prices come down somewhat, they heave a sigh of relief and pay the new price, which is lower than it was, but not nearly as low as it was before (this is the NINTH such occurrence since March) each time the overall price remaining higher than it was). If we could see a chart of gasoline prices over the last forty years it would look like a saw blade, going VERY high, then going back to a level ABOVE the old price. This is how the "powers that be" set prices, and raise them, while :"conditioning" you to pay a higher price each time. In this manner, they SLOWLY raise the price while getting you used to paying more. (Energy Plug)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama Just Soesn't Know!

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Tuesday, May 27, 2008 2:52:24 PM
Obama was heard to say, in a Memorial Day speech, "We are gathered here today to honor those who have fallen in defense of their country, many of whom I see here today." Really? What did they do? Dig them up and prop them up so he could see them? Is it possible Obama doesn't know that "fallen" means DEAD? If so, how could they "be here today?" I know Obama is a "product" of public school education, but I didn't think even THAT would make him that ignorant. Maybe I was wrong. (Just common sense)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Liberals "Dancing in the Streets!"

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Tuesday, May 27, 2008 1:47:53 PM
"NEW YORK - Soaring gas prices and weakening job prospects left shoppers gloomier about the economy in May, sending a key barometer of consumer sentiment to its lowest level in almost 16 years." And naturally, the 'news item' about it uses a picture of one of their hated "big box stores," Target. This news couldn't be better for liberals because every percentile this goes down is millions of votes to keep liberals in power. It works because most people don't pay attention to politics until just before an election, so don't know that the conditions that CAUSED this situation came from THEIR policies. Yet they keep trumpeting "change" long enough, people believe they can DO something about these situations THEY caused. I'm getting really tired of repeating what I said above, but maybe that's what it will take to "wake up" Americans that their biggest enemy (besides Islamic terrorists) is liberalism, which, if they have their way, will have us under a collectivist (socialist) government soon. (Yahoo News)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous123456Next »