About Me

Name:The New THOMA$ REPORT
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Search

"Marxist Mama" Leads Democrat Convention

Leah Daughtry, "the boss" at the Democrat Convention in Denver is a "Marxist Mama" who believes in "redistribution of (your) wealth" by any means necessary. She also believes fervently in the same "white racism" preached by Rev. Jeremiah Wright and has done her own preaching on the subject. She also believes God "approves" of killing infants in the womb rather than use a rubber. How do such people gain high office in a political party? It's beyond me. What's REALLY odd to me is when Democrats, who have as black WOMAN as CEO of their convention, still can, with a straight face, talk about "racism" in this country. She must be really giggling at the stupidity of Democrats. What REALLY amazes me is when TV "interviewers" interview her, NO ONE ever asks her about her Marxist ties OR her "white racism." (They probably don't even know about it because reporters today do NOT do "in depth" research. (Death by 1000 Paper Cuts) and (Canadian Free Press)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

He's a Cartoonist! He Doesn't Need to Stick to the Truth!

That's what someone said one time when Doonesbury was caught falsifying things in order to make a point. He did it again on the 5th of July when he made what was a common sense action by Republicans look like something sinister. Democrats don't want ANYTHING that might stop them from falsifying votes, which is how they've won many elections in the past. The whole idea that requiring picture ID to vote IS common sense, something that is foreign to liberals (Democrats). They want to allow just ANYBODY to vote, citizen or not, as many times as they can, which is only possible if they don't have to identify themselves in a way that is hard to "get past." But Doonesbury agrees with other liberals that ANYBODY ought to be able to vote, ANYWHERE, without having to identify him/herself. He even IDENTIFIED it, having a character call it "eliminating voter fraud," and saying by doing so they could "disenfranchise the poor, the infirm, students, minorities, and anyone who can't be counted on to vote responsibly." Funny; that's what DEMOCRATS do. They learned it in Chicago politics, where they "reign supreme," and where Obama is from. Seems to me if you don't require strict identification of voters, you're heading for an election disaster. The character goes on to say "disenfranchisement works" and points to Florida, saying Republicans can win, even if they lose. Funny; he never mentions Bush won the way the Constitution SAYS he should win--not the way the DEMOCRATS think it should have happened, unless a Democrat is in the same position as was Bush. Then he says they're "change agents." What stupidity! (Doonesbury)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

History's First Vegetarian

I don't know what Chad Carpeter's political leanings are yet, but his humor is VERY subtle (usually) and based on (mostly) truth as perceived. I loved his strip on July 7 titled, "History's First Vegetarian." (Tundra)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Iran's "Cruisin' For A Bruisin"

They're doing the exact same thing Iraq did, and look what happened to them. The only difference is, the danger from "weapons of mass destruction" in their case is much worse than it was with Iraq. If they keep it up, they'll become "the world's biggest parking lot." If they think we aren't able to "take them down," they've got several other thinks coming. We could do it in a week without even hurting our work in Iraq and Afghanistan. Then, after all the "big mouths" are gone, we can quit worrying about them. Joe Leiberman says what they're doing in training Islamic "insurgents" (otherwise known as "terrorists") is "an act of war." So now that all the legal requirements are there, how long will it be before we move on them? And, as in Saddam's case, they will have brought it on themselves. (News Max)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

This Is Obama

Obama's "fingerprints" may not be on it, but that's no surprise. He HATES it when anyone opposes him. Even to talking about the size of his "elephant ears." He thinks there are some things that he can tell the press NOT to talk about, and they'll not talk about it. He thinks he can "threaten" people and intimidate them into not talking about things. In this case it's a "new" left-wing organization (run by the former Washington Director of MoverOn.org making the threats, but even if Obama's fingerprints aren't on it, I'd BET he approves. This is the kind of politician he is. If he doesn't like what you say, he'll do everything he can to "shut you up." MoveOn, you'll remember, csame into existence to try and get America to "move on" from allegations of lying before Congress laid against Bill Clinton and who has, since then, done everything it can to destroy Republicans. (News Max)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Be Careful What You Ask For

That would be my advice to the Iraq "official" that is saying he wants a "clear timeline" (comes right out of the liberal handbook) for U. S. troops to be out of Iraq. He's better be careful. When U. S. troops leave, the terrorists will take advantage of it and will probably "run right over" the Iraq troops left to "contain" them. And I'd bet one of the first to die will be Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari.Maybe he ought to rethink that. When the U. S. pulled out of Viet Nam because liberals cut off their funding, a massacre ensued, killing millions of people. Liberals still say Viet Nam was a U. S. loss. But truth is, it was a "liberal win!" They got what they wanted at the cost of millions of Vietnamese lives. (Yahoo News)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »