About Me

Name:The New THOMA$ REPORT
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Search

Search

The "Fairness Doctrine?"

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Wednesday, August 13, 2008 5:03:10 PM
The liberals still are talking about a "return of the fairness doctrine." They think they can even "control what's on the Internet" by requiring any web site that criticizes a liberal to publish "the other side." They want to "shut up" the opposition. ("Fairness Doctrine, my sore rear end!) It'll never happen. My web sites and others like it ARE "the other side" while the liberals have just about every other news source out there. I would not put a word written or uttered by a liberal on ANY of my web sites except to tell my readers what I'm criticizing and ridiculing. If they think they can force me to do any more, they can go to hell! Jail me. If they think they can dictate the content of my web sites, they can "take it and stick it." I don't have to kowtow to the FCC for a license to exercise free speech. They're even discussing it in Congress today, but they don't have the guts to call it "The Fairness Doctrine," hoping people who don't pay attention won't recognize it. If a liberal (Democrat) gets into the White House with a liberal-dominated Congress, look for them to try it. I guess being in prison is a good place to die. At least they'll have to pay all my medical bills. If they succeed, look for them to try and force authors of books critical of their actions to be told to include "the other side" in their books. Books such as my own "What's WRONG in America." I look forward to THAT fight. (Business & Media Institute)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Communist China Cheats

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Wednesday, August 13, 2008 4:55:45 PM
Surprised? I'm not. I know what kind or people are running things there. They lie, they cheat, they "spin" what they can't lie about. In this case, they used girls on their gymnast team TWO YEARS YOUNGER than is allowed, in order to win, and so get more gold medals than anybody else, for propaganda purposes. This isn't in dispute. At least not among people with any degree of intelligence. "There is absolutely no doubt -- none, zero, zilch - that the Chinese 'women's' gymnastics team featured several little girls no older than 14 years of age -- two years younger than the international federation allows for competition. Online registrations of these girls list one age, their passports list another. This is blatant cheating - no other word for it."  Their age on their Olympic Application lists one age, and their passports another. But the Olympic Committee, faced with a "fait accompli," let it go and accepted the age on their application. So I guess the claims of the Communist Chinese will forever be tainted, whether or not they ever admit it. In the shooting competition, the officials awarded the gold medal, even though the shooter MISSED the target! It's obvious that communist China has "fixed" the games so they could win more medals than anyone else and have "bragging rights" at least for the next four years. (American Thinker)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The "Truth Scandal"

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Wednesday, August 13, 2008 4:53:22 PM
The news spinners are twisting the Edwards sex scandal AS a "sex scandal." It is not. It is a "truth scandal," with a presidential candidate, then a vice-presidential candidate not only lying about his illicit sexual affair while his wife was fighting cancer, but calling the newspaper who broke it "tabloid trash," when what they were reporting was, simply, true. How can we ever count on our presidential candidates to tell us the truth when this man lied so copiously until he could lie about it no longer? Obama lies every day, but the liberal press ignores it. They even divert our attention from it and make excuses for him. (The American Thinker)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Dems Will Never "Get It" About Gun Control

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Tuesday, August 12, 2008 4:32:42 PM
CCRKBA says, "Dems Still Don't Get It About Gun Control," as if they thought they ever would. It isn't IN the Democrats to "Get it" about gun control because their definition of "gun control" is forever wrong. They think LAWS will "keep guns out of the hands of criminals." My question is, "How?" Criminals do not obey laws, so how do they expect a law to do it? That's sheer stupidity! Their basic premise is that a criminal will obey a law that says a criminal can't carry a gun is erroneous. A criminal is a criminal because he DOESN'T OBEY LAWS. So why should he OBEY a law that says he can't be armed? What they're up to is removing guns from the hands of honest people so their thugs won't meet guns when they come to your door to take what's yours. The very reason the Japanese didn't make an attack on our homeland during WWII is because they thought there'd "be a gun behind every bush." Today's enemies, the liberals (collectivists, socialists) think the same thing and want to prevent it. You can call me an "extremist" if you wish for saying this, but if you allow them to take your guns, one day you'll wish you had listened to me. (CCRKBA)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Give 'Em the Power, They'll Abuse It

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Tuesday, August 12, 2008 4:28:47 PM
You'd better watch your facial expressions in the future when going through that "Sovietized" system they've got at airports across the country (and probably throughout the world). They soon will have people there who do NOTHING except look at your face and see if you're disgusted at the treatment you've received. If they, in their "wisdom," decide you ARE, you’re subject to being "punished" for it by being subjected to even more "scrutiny" than before. And the whole system is so SUBJECTIVE that there's no way you can fight it because those who ENFORCE it DECIDE what constitutes "disgust" by looking at the expression on your face. It's one thing to look for people who might fly airplanes into buildings and something quite different to hunt for "looks of disgust" on the faces of people who are undergoing a disgusting time. Seems to me they'd "lighten up" a little bit instead of LOOKING for trouble. (Common Sense)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

One Man Showed Up

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Tuesday, August 12, 2008 4:24:43 PM
"What if a political candidate scheduled a campaign appearance and no one showed up? Democratic senatorial hopeful Al Franken came within one person of finding out in St. Cloud, Minn. Only one soul turned out for a 'roundtable' on veterans’ issues Friday at Brigitte’s Café in the city northwest of Minneapolis. Josh John, a St. Cloud resident who said he served in the Navy from 2000 to 2004, had the former 'Saturday Night Live' comedian all to himself for an hour, the St. Cloud Times reported." Maybe If Franken told a few jokes he could "double" the turnout (if someone went outside and grabbed some people). (News Max)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »