About Me

Name:The New THOMA$ REPORT
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Search

How STUPID Do They Think We Are?

ABC, NBC, CBS, "The Washington Post," The "New York Times," and all the left-wing blogs and web sites are telling you that YOU "want more gun control!" They cite "studies" and polls that turn out to have been done by anti-gun freaks themselves. They ask questions for these polls and studies ONLY of other gun-control freaks and pretend they are real polls and studies (Has anybody asked YOU any questions about gun control?). The very questions they ask are tailored to get an answer in favor of gun control. They ran 650 stories about "crime and the need for gun control," using the usual false "facts and figures" that are just not logical. There were only TWO stories about the use of guns for self-defense in the same time period--and they are distorted. They REFUSE to run the many stories of people using legally-owned guns in self-defense (millions of them, actually, sometimes just by showing one and not even having to fire a shot), forcing each one to remain "a local story" so the nation, as a whole, won't "tumble" to the millions of legal gun owners who have used their guns in self-defense. They're trying to make a law right now so that, if a criminal STEALS your gun and commits a crime with it, they can send YOU to federal prison (H. R. 256) and another to allow the Attorney General the UNCONTESTED power to put your name on a secret government list and BAN YOU from buying a gun--forever (H. R. 1237). These are only a few of the onerous bills the liberal gun control freaks want to pass into law, including one to fingerprint, photograph, test you, license you, investigate you, and tax you, just to own a gun for your own defense (H. R. 2666).Remember, gun-hating Democrats are now "in charge" in both houses and if a Democrat is elected president, look for the "gun hunt" to begin. You need to let your representatives know that you will not stand for them disarming you so the closest illegally-armed criminal can target you and maybe kill you, while you can't do anything about it. (Just common sense)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Whaddaya Know?

They're going to place Hillary's name in nomination at the national Democrat convention in Denver. And I wouldn't be surprised if she has sealed up the votes to get the nomination over Obama (Like Bill, she "knows where the bodies are buried"). I've been predicting that all along. She's the "queen!" She's not going to let this unknown, untried upstart take away her chance to be president! They SAY it is something she and Obama AGREED to, to "heal" the divisions in the party. I hear Obama came "kicking and screaming" to this position. But I'd bet she'll force more than one vote to get a REAL nominee, and she intends it be her. I'll give her one thing; she never gives up. She wants to be president, by "hook or crook." (Yahoo News)

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The "Fairness Doctrine?"

The liberals still are talking about a "return of the fairness doctrine." They think they can even "control what's on the Internet" by requiring any web site that criticizes a liberal to publish "the other side." They want to "shut up" the opposition. ("Fairness Doctrine, my sore rear end!) It'll never happen. My web sites and others like it ARE "the other side" while the liberals have just about every other news source out there. I would not put a word written or uttered by a liberal on ANY of my web sites except to tell my readers what I'm criticizing and ridiculing. If they think they can force me to do any more, they can go to hell! Jail me. If they think they can dictate the content of my web sites, they can "take it and stick it." I don't have to kowtow to the FCC for a license to exercise free speech. They're even discussing it in Congress today, but they don't have the guts to call it "The Fairness Doctrine," hoping people who don't pay attention won't recognize it. If a liberal (Democrat) gets into the White House with a liberal-dominated Congress, look for them to try it. I guess being in prison is a good place to die. At least they'll have to pay all my medical bills. If they succeed, look for them to try and force authors of books critical of their actions to be told to include "the other side" in their books. Books such as my own "What's WRONG in America." I look forward to THAT fight. (Business & Media Institute)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Communist China Cheats

Surprised? I'm not. I know what kind or people are running things there. They lie, they cheat, they "spin" what they can't lie about. In this case, they used girls on their gymnast team TWO YEARS YOUNGER than is allowed, in order to win, and so get more gold medals than anybody else, for propaganda purposes. This isn't in dispute. At least not among people with any degree of intelligence. "There is absolutely no doubt -- none, zero, zilch - that the Chinese 'women's' gymnastics team featured several little girls no older than 14 years of age -- two years younger than the international federation allows for competition. Online registrations of these girls list one age, their passports list another. This is blatant cheating - no other word for it."  Their age on their Olympic Application lists one age, and their passports another. But the Olympic Committee, faced with a "fait accompli," let it go and accepted the age on their application. So I guess the claims of the Communist Chinese will forever be tainted, whether or not they ever admit it. In the shooting competition, the officials awarded the gold medal, even though the shooter MISSED the target! It's obvious that communist China has "fixed" the games so they could win more medals than anyone else and have "bragging rights" at least for the next four years. (American Thinker)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The "Truth Scandal"

The news spinners are twisting the Edwards sex scandal AS a "sex scandal." It is not. It is a "truth scandal," with a presidential candidate, then a vice-presidential candidate not only lying about his illicit sexual affair while his wife was fighting cancer, but calling the newspaper who broke it "tabloid trash," when what they were reporting was, simply, true. How can we ever count on our presidential candidates to tell us the truth when this man lied so copiously until he could lie about it no longer? Obama lies every day, but the liberal press ignores it. They even divert our attention from it and make excuses for him. (The American Thinker)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »