About Me

Name:The New THOMA$ REPORT
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Search

The "Kennedy Method"

It's a proven method to avoid what would normally be a certain investigation that would prove your guilt. Admit what can be proved, then DEMAND a full investigation, while paying off the victim, or victim's family to block any attempt at an investigation. Teddy did it at Chappaquiddick, demanding an autopsy, well knowing the Kopechne family was opposing an autopsy, so none was done, for the first time in Massachusetts history in such a case. Now John Edwards is demanding a paternity test, knowing his girlfriend was opposing it. Works like a charm, as long as you can depend on the "other side" to remain paid off. I guess Edwards IS "Kennedyesque," after all. (Ann Coulter)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Do We Care?

Chuck Norris, of "Walker, Texas Ranger" fame, asks the same question that liberals have been promoting to protect Bill Clinton. That illicit sex is a "personal matter" and shouldn't be "fodder" for public consumption. I like Chuck, and in most things agree with him. But in this case, he completely misses the point, as do liberals--on purpose. It's not the indiscretion (though we ought to be able to expect the best of behavior from people who pretend to make laws to tell us how to live and what to do). It's the lying. We ought to be able to depend on what our politicians say, but we can't. And this is one case where the lie is PROVEN. Bill Clinton would lie when the truth would serve better, but Democrats still say he was one of the best presidents ever--even though he was IMPEACHED, and is a convicted felon who was disbarred for five years (a résumé enhancement for a Democrat), which only shows their ignorance. Do we care if he had sex with a woman not his wife?: No. That's not our business. Do we care that he lied, calling the newspaper that broke the story "tabloid trash?" Yes. We DO care about that, and I'm glad he wasn't elected vice president. I don't think he should be elected ANYTHING. But that would allow him to go back to his sleazy lawyering. What made him rich, in the first place, victimizing many people. It's a hard decision. (Chuck Norris)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

How STUPID Do They Think We Are?

ABC, NBC, CBS, "The Washington Post," The "New York Times," and all the left-wing blogs and web sites are telling you that YOU "want more gun control!" They cite "studies" and polls that turn out to have been done by anti-gun freaks themselves. They ask questions for these polls and studies ONLY of other gun-control freaks and pretend they are real polls and studies (Has anybody asked YOU any questions about gun control?). The very questions they ask are tailored to get an answer in favor of gun control. They ran 650 stories about "crime and the need for gun control," using the usual false "facts and figures" that are just not logical. There were only TWO stories about the use of guns for self-defense in the same time period--and they are distorted. They REFUSE to run the many stories of people using legally-owned guns in self-defense (millions of them, actually, sometimes just by showing one and not even having to fire a shot), forcing each one to remain "a local story" so the nation, as a whole, won't "tumble" to the millions of legal gun owners who have used their guns in self-defense. They're trying to make a law right now so that, if a criminal STEALS your gun and commits a crime with it, they can send YOU to federal prison (H. R. 256) and another to allow the Attorney General the UNCONTESTED power to put your name on a secret government list and BAN YOU from buying a gun--forever (H. R. 1237). These are only a few of the onerous bills the liberal gun control freaks want to pass into law, including one to fingerprint, photograph, test you, license you, investigate you, and tax you, just to own a gun for your own defense (H. R. 2666).Remember, gun-hating Democrats are now "in charge" in both houses and if a Democrat is elected president, look for the "gun hunt" to begin. You need to let your representatives know that you will not stand for them disarming you so the closest illegally-armed criminal can target you and maybe kill you, while you can't do anything about it. (Just common sense)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Whaddaya Know?

They're going to place Hillary's name in nomination at the national Democrat convention in Denver. And I wouldn't be surprised if she has sealed up the votes to get the nomination over Obama (Like Bill, she "knows where the bodies are buried"). I've been predicting that all along. She's the "queen!" She's not going to let this unknown, untried upstart take away her chance to be president! They SAY it is something she and Obama AGREED to, to "heal" the divisions in the party. I hear Obama came "kicking and screaming" to this position. But I'd bet she'll force more than one vote to get a REAL nominee, and she intends it be her. I'll give her one thing; she never gives up. She wants to be president, by "hook or crook." (Yahoo News)

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »