Posted by
The New THOMA$ REPORT on Friday, August 15, 2008 8:56:38 AM
Chuck Norris, of "Walker, Texas Ranger"
fame, asks the same question that liberals have been promoting to protect Bill
Clinton. That illicit sex is a "personal matter" and shouldn't be
"fodder" for public consumption. I like Chuck, and in most things
agree with him. But in this case, he completely misses the point, as do
liberals--on purpose. It's not the indiscretion (though we ought to be able to
expect the best of behavior from people who pretend to make laws to tell us how
to live and what to do). It's the lying. We ought to be able to depend on what
our politicians say, but we can't. And this is one case where the lie is
PROVEN. Bill Clinton would lie when the truth would serve better, but Democrats
still say he was one of the best presidents ever--even though he was IMPEACHED,
and is a convicted felon who was disbarred for five years (a résumé enhancement
for a Democrat), which only shows their ignorance. Do we care if he had sex
with a woman not his wife?: No. That's not our business. Do we care that he
lied, calling the newspaper that broke the story "tabloid trash?"
Yes. We DO care about that, and I'm glad he wasn't elected vice president. I
don't think he should be elected ANYTHING. But that would allow him to go back to
his sleazy lawyering. What made him rich, in the first place, victimizing many
people. It's a hard decision. (Chuck Norris)