About Me

Name:The New THOMA$ REPORT
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Search

Search

"Shocking the Experts" (Again)

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Wednesday, August 20, 2008 5:10:22 PM
Why is it every time the economy gets better it "shocks" the experts? I thought they had their fingers "on the pulse" of the economy. I'm no economist, but I can "read the tea-leaves" and see that the economy, as a whole, is still intact, no matter how often the liberals try and convince us it isn't. Conservative economists such as Walter E. Williams and Thomas Sowell are NOT "shocked" at the direction the economy is taking because they have been trying to tell us about it for a long time; unfortunately, nobody is listening. (Investment Executive)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Zogby: McCain Takes the Lead

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Wednesday, August 20, 2008 5:05:41 PM
The Zogby Poll, which has been right when most others were wrong--says McCain has "surged ahead" of Obama by five points. "Five points!" Not a lot, but he is moving in the right direction. Maybe because people are beginning to realize he's an "empty suit" parroting what his "handlers" have taught him, but without a single good idea of his own. That he is a "dedicated socialist" who wants to take what you have earned and give it to the people who produce nothing, but who have a vote. A man who has NO experience and is "way above his pay grade" in all things presidential; a man who doesn't have a clue on what to do, but "speaks well" when he has a teleprompter and a speechwriter but who can't speak at all without it. I think the possibility of Obama ever being president is receding with every passing day, and every word out of his mouth--unless McCain torpedoes himself by choosing a pro-abortion vice-president. (News Max)

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Irresponsible Democrat Policies

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Tuesday, August 19, 2008 4:43:28 PM
If you had a pocketful of money you could spend, but it was starting to get low, you'd do something to replenish it, wouldn't you? The same applies to our supply of oil (the thing that has CREATED this prosperous country and which, if its cost continues to go up, will bankrupt it). But the Democrats, while they continue to USE oil, refuse to do ANYTHING to replenish our supplies, so we're forced to rely on foreign providers, many of whom HATE us. They won't let us drill ANYWHERE we run things. They won't let us build new oil refineries (for more than 30 years) while building Ethanol refineries by the hundreds. Their excuses for not building oil refineries just don't hold water if they're building ANY other kind. They think that, somehow, we'll find an alternative source of energy "from thin air" if "we wish hard enough." We've GOT oil! More than enough to run our economy for longer than any of us will live if they'll just let us go after it! Then people like a certain liberal/environmental extremist Colorado politician (Mark Udall, D-Co) who has been largely responsible for the BAN on drilling OR refining does commercials saying "we need to draw a line in the sand" as if HE was not "part of the problem! Sheesh! (Common Sense)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"Hate Writing?"

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Tuesday, August 19, 2008 4:40:32 PM
Is this illegal? Not if you ask a liberal. This writer is attempting to implicate Rush Limbaugh and other "conservative" personalities (probably me too, if he knew about me). Is this "hate writing?" If someone reads this and takes a shot at Rush or some other conservative, will this writer be responsible? He'll say no, but his very thesis says "yes." Be careful, liberals, what you write. It works both ways. If you see that as a threat, then so be it. Your seeing it so doesn't make it so. Has Rush EVER said "liberals ought to be shot?" No; only this writer. So should he be jailed? Just because Hannity said "there are some things worth fighting and dying for" doesn't mean he wants someone to kill a liberal, just that sometimes WARS are "just." Just because a deranged man reads conservative books and goes out and kills someone, does that make the writers guilty? What if someone read THIS article and went out and killed a conservative? Then he compares these serious conservatives to such as Howard Stern, who does NOTHING seriously, but does EVERYTHING to "shock.  Gawd, how stupid these people are! (Newsday)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The "Impossible Dream"

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Tuesday, August 19, 2008 4:37:16 PM
Women are promoting an "impossible dream" if they think a "restraining order," especially one gotten without allowing the subject his constitutional rights before it is issued, ever does any good. It's "just a piece of paper" to someone who really intends to do harm to a woman. Most men who harm women have "restraining orders" against them already, but routinely ignore them. It's like the "drug war." It has been in existence for many years, but drug use is higher today on a per capita basis than it was the day the "drug war" started, while many unconstitutional laws have been made and enforced in the name of "getting drugs off the streets," but have done nothing to do so. Better a woman should be allowed to get a gun for self defense without a lot of red tape. (Phyllis Schlafly)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »