About Me

Name:The New THOMA$ REPORT
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Search

Search

Productivity Up, Labor Costs Down

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Thursday, September 04, 2008 1:51:53 PM
Liberals hate it, as they hate everything that’s “good for the country.” It’s productivity that makes for profit, while lower labor costs LOWER the “cost of productivity.” This is WHY liberals (socialists) hate it. Liberals look upon “profit” as “evil.” They forget that without profit, this country, even the world, cannot survive. Profit is the “lubricant” that makes this world work. Even communist China, which only grudgingly allows its citizens to make ANY profit, must make a profit in its dealings with the rest of the world as they make so many things we buy--at a PROFIT to them. The more we buy for them, the more PROFIT they make, and the bigger they grow in the world’s markets. (Yahoo News)


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Liberal Opinions Defy Logic

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Thursday, September 04, 2008 1:49:06 PM
They still think the Soviet Union collapsed on its own. But this book tells the REAL tale: "Who brought down the Soviet Union? According to liberals, it collapsed of its own, with an assist from the reform-minded Mikhail Gorbachev. But this explanation not only scants the role of Western anti-communists -- it implies they had exaggerated its dangers all along. Now, John O'Sullivan gives credit where it's due. "The President, the Pope, and the Prime Minister" is a sweeping, dramatic account of how President Ronald Reagan, Pope John Paul II, and British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher together took on the most powerful and aggressive foe that liberty has ever known -- and won." They same liberals now say there is no way we can win against the Islamic terrorists. But the USSR was a much bigger, more powerful for than a "rag-tag bunch of jerks" such as we're facing now. You can buy this book for only $19.95. It's on sale right now (as this is written). So if you want to see the truth, buy it (I make no money if you do).


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

How Will Sarah Handle Her Family as VP?

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Thursday, September 04, 2008 1:44:40 PM
This is a question that would NEVER be asked of a man. They assume the “family matters” will ably handled by his wife. Not so with women (unless her name is Hillary). They figure it’s “woman’s work” to handle the “family matters” and ignore the presence of the man in the equation. And they’re now demanding a “paternity test” to prove the child she recently had is really here, and not her daughter’s. As to the speech at the convention, they’re saying, “She was handed the speech and she did a good job reading it, though it was ‘strong on insults and short on substance” Something the Democrats SAY they “decry.” This is pure sexism (I think it WAS “strong on substance, which, to a Democrat is “insulting.”). They say that a woman should be able to do everything a man can do, EXCEPT be vice-president, if she’s a Republican. That don’t think the same way if she is a Democrat and has a family. Has anyone asked Obama how HE is going to “handle family matters” if he is elected president? Nope. I do agree that neither side has talked much about the issues. Democrats whine about “health care,” which they want to force upon us whether or not we want it. They want to move us closer to a socialist government--again, whether or not we want it. I wish both of them would talk more about such things so we will not be surp[rised at what they DO when they get in office--whichever of them do. (Pajamas Media)


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »