About Me

Name: The New THOMA$...
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Search

Sabotaging the Economy

Ever since Ronald Reagan reduced taxes and almost DOUBLED the "tax take" the Democrats have been making a purposeful effort to SABOTAGE the economy so their lying predictions of a recession would come true. And when Bush "compounded" things by reducing taxes (again), continuing the excellent economy Reagan started, they put their plan in "high gear" Earlier they had created of the "Community Reinvestment Act of 1977" (CRA) while they had a Democrat-dominated Congress and a Democrat president (Clinton) at the same time. This law MANDATED "economic suicide" by FORCING lending companies to loan money to people who cannot repay it (to avoid being accused of "redlining," thus making sure that several of the largest lenders in the business would "go belly-up" or require BILLIONS in aid. Among the first to go were the two main companies the GOVERNMENT set up to BUY all these bad loans with tax money, making it easier on these more honest lenders who were forced to make such loans and slow down the march to disaster. Their timing was perfect. Their "chickens came home to roost less than a month before the 2008 presidential election and they're falsely claiming the whole thing is the fault of "eight years of Bush (translation: Republican) policies and now have the major issue they wanted for the election (Meanwhile, even the Republicans won't talk about CRA). The truth is, the Republicans tried to "rein them in" 12 times, and every time, the Democrats blocked them.

They're counting on the fact that MOST Americans just don't pay any attention to politics until just before an election, when the lies are flying; and so haven't a clue as to what the Democrats (liberals) are doing and "swallow" all their lies, "hook, line, and sinker." They hope this will translate into TOTAL control of our government by Democrats so they can move us ever closer to socialism, where the government makes all your major decisions and tells you how to spend what little money you have left after they tax most of it away from you. Their problem now is they went too far and even they now can't "fix it." People WILL notice that come next election (even if they're not paying attention to the ACTIONS of the government) and that's when they'll lose their dominance. Unfortunately, even the Republicans won't be able to "fix it" in the next four years after that and the Americans, who NEVER "pay attention" to what politicians are doing overall, will put another Democrat administration back in, and the cycle will repeat itself. I hope I'm dead by then. (Just common sense)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Judge Wants to Release Muslims in America

He says they're "no longer considered to be terrorists" so should be released from Guantanamo INTO THE U. S. Not to be returned to the country from which they were captured. Into the U. S,! "In a landmark decision, U.S. District Judge Ricardo M. Urbina (ur-BEE'-nuh) said it would be wrong for the Bush administration to continue holding the detainees, known as Uighurs (WEE'gurz), since they are no longer considered enemy combatants." Who says? And who is it that thinks they should be released into the United States instead of being returned to their own country? What has this judge been SMOKING? Things like this, which come from judges appointed by Democrats) can only make it more dangerous to live in this country after people like this are released HERE, not sent home. The Democrats haven't been able yet to say that "Bush's policies" have made us LESS safe, but they're working hard on it. (Yahoo News)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Don't Believe Any of the Polls!

With very few exceptions, polls are designed to FORM public opinion, not "measure" it. It's not the questions you ask, for the most part, but WHO you ask that makes a poll say what you want. There was one poll that asked the question, "Who do you think will win the election?" The first time they took it, they asked more Republicans than Democrats. Later, they did another poll, asking the same question. But in this one, they asked more DEMOCRATS than Republicans. The results were predictable: a big increase in people who thought the DEMOCRAT would win. Same question, two polls, two different groups, the last one "weighted" more heavily by Democrats. Who do you THINK they would think would win, compared to the earlier poll weighted by Republicans? (Yahoo News)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

It's Not About Iraq or Iran

The "war on terror" is what we're fighting. It's amphorus. You kill one head and two more take his place. Or maybe ten. You kill a thousand Islamic terrorists in whatever country, and ten thousand take their place. The Democrats keep taking about us "not getting bin Laden. They're wrong. The reason we can't find bin Laden is that he is a cinder. He became a "crispy critter" years ago when we bombed a cave in which he was living, and the Islamic terrorists have been trying for years to convince the world he's still alive and still running things. But we haven't seen a tape of him speaking that contains ANY proof it wasn't made years ago. We're not "at war" in Iraq or Afghanistan. We're "at war" with Islamic terrorism worldwide. Iraq and Afghanistan are merely BATTLES in this war. Those wars were over within weeks (or less). The problem is, these murderous thugs are hard to find. So we have to keep killing them as fast as we find them. We killed another top al Qaida leader in Iraq this week (at this writing) but again, two more will "spring up" to replace him. In a culture where getting killed is a GOOD thing, there are no shortage of idiots ready to take his place on a slab somewhere. (Just common sense)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Judge Wants to Release Muslims in America

He says they're "no longer considered to be terrorists" so should be released from Guantanamo INTO THE U. S. Not to be returned to the country from which they were captured. Into the U. S,! "In a landmark decision, U.S. District Judge Ricardo M. Urbina (ur-BEE'-nuh) said it would be wrong for the Bush administration to continue holding the detainees, known as Uighurs (WEE'gurz), since they are no longer considered enemy combatants." Who says? And who is it that thinks they should be released into the United States instead of being returned to their own country? What has this judge been SMOKING? Things like this, which come from judges appointed by Democrats) can only make it more dangerous to live in this country after people like this are released HERE, not sent home. The Democrats haven't been able yet to say that "Bush's policies" have made us LESS safe, but they're working hard on it. (Yahoo News)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »