About Me

Name: The New THOMA$...
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Search

The Obama Truth

A corrupt Chicago Machine politician "made a U.S. Senator" out of Barack Obama; he won his first election by having his lawyers knock all his opponents off the ballot on technicalities; how his support for a grotesque "infanticide" law (allowing the murder of babies who survived a botched abortion) that was too extreme even for Nancy Pelosi (and that takes some doing!); he says he's never done any favors for convicted felon, developer Tony Rezko---but he has. He SAYS he's "African-American" (black). But he isn't. He's of ARAB descent, and spent most of his formative years learning from Islamics. I don't know if he BUYS that crap or not, but it has certainly had an effect on his life. Donate money to "Human Events" and they'll send you the same report they had bound into 5,000 issues of their newspaper distributed at the Republican National Convention (trying that at the Democrat National Convention would be a waste of time and money). They want to distribute it to millions of students so they won't gullibly vote for Obama. (Just common sense)


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

How Dumb Can You Be?

Apparently not as dumb as Ed Tucker, who wrote a letter to the editor of the "Wilmington, [DE] News-Journal," saying, "The disastrous policies that spawned our recent mortgage crisis prove that congressional term limits would be a very bad idea." Actually, they do not. It has become obvious that Barney Frank, the man Tucker is fawning over, is "in on the scam," having fought every effort by the Republicans (12 times) to add more regulation to Fannie and Freddie, saying, "There's nothing wrong with them." Subsequent events have proven that there was not only "something wrong" with them, they were in the middle of a liberal SWINDLE that cost Americans BILLIONS of dollars, and will probably cost them billions more. Barney himself profited handsomely from this swindle and his protests were a feeble attempt to keep us from finding out about the swindle. Where Ed gets the idea that being in Congress for a long time makes Barney a "smart fellow," I don't know. It just allows Barney a longer time to work his swindle. The "disastrous policies" that caused this "meltdown" were promulgated by Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, and Franklin Raines. Barney isn't "smart." He's CLEVER, or his swindle wouldn't have worked. If he were smart, he wouldn't have allowed his boyfriend to start a whorehouse in his apartment. (Common Sense)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Part of the Scam

I was wrong. I thought the only thing besides a lot of money there was for Democrats in CREATING the "economic fiasco was to con Americans into voting for a Democrat for president, and other Democrats in other support positions. Now I find out the government is looking to have an "OWNERSHIP POSITION" in the banks they "help out," and will thus have partial CONTROL of those banks. That's NATIONALIZATION of important private sector businesses; businesses that can, through their lending policies, CONTROL the business and individuals to whom they loan money. Will it EVER end? Is there ANY way to "rein in" these Democrats before they make a socialist nation out of America? No matter who is in the White House, the liberals (Democrats) still control a large part of this nation through their positions of power in not only government, but education, labor unions, etc. (Yahoo News)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

How Many Lies Can He Tell?

Without getting "called on it" by the liberal media? Many, I guess, while if Sarah Palin told just ONE, the liberals would be insisting she "pull out" of the election (They're already saying that. She makes Democrats "wet their pants" at the sound of her name.). Ann Coulter lists just a few of his more recent ones in a recent column. And we don't have to depend on her word. You can find just about everything he has said somewhere on the Internet (but not in liberal sites). Check out this column and be enlightened. (Ann Coulter)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Sabotaging the Economy

Ever since Ronald Reagan reduced taxes and almost DOUBLED the "tax take" the Democrats have been making a purposeful effort to SABOTAGE the economy so their lying predictions of a recession would come true. And when Bush "compounded" things by reducing taxes (again), continuing the excellent economy Reagan started, they put their plan in "high gear" Earlier they had created of the "Community Reinvestment Act of 1977" (CRA) while they had a Democrat-dominated Congress and a Democrat president (Clinton) at the same time. This law MANDATED "economic suicide" by FORCING lending companies to loan money to people who cannot repay it (to avoid being accused of "redlining," thus making sure that several of the largest lenders in the business would "go belly-up" or require BILLIONS in aid. Among the first to go were the two main companies the GOVERNMENT set up to BUY all these bad loans with tax money, making it easier on these more honest lenders who were forced to make such loans and slow down the march to disaster. Their timing was perfect. Their "chickens came home to roost less than a month before the 2008 presidential election and they're falsely claiming the whole thing is the fault of "eight years of Bush (translation: Republican) policies and now have the major issue they wanted for the election (Meanwhile, even the Republicans won't talk about CRA). The truth is, the Republicans tried to "rein them in" 12 times, and every time, the Democrats blocked them.

They're counting on the fact that MOST Americans just don't pay any attention to politics until just before an election, when the lies are flying; and so haven't a clue as to what the Democrats (liberals) are doing and "swallow" all their lies, "hook, line, and sinker." They hope this will translate into TOTAL control of our government by Democrats so they can move us ever closer to socialism, where the government makes all your major decisions and tells you how to spend what little money you have left after they tax most of it away from you. Their problem now is they went too far and even they now can't "fix it." People WILL notice that come next election (even if they're not paying attention to the ACTIONS of the government) and that's when they'll lose their dominance. Unfortunately, even the Republicans won't be able to "fix it" in the next four years after that and the Americans, who NEVER "pay attention" to what politicians are doing overall, will put another Democrat administration back in, and the cycle will repeat itself. I hope I'm dead by then. (Just common sense)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Judge Wants to Release Muslims in America

He says they're "no longer considered to be terrorists" so should be released from Guantanamo INTO THE U. S. Not to be returned to the country from which they were captured. Into the U. S,! "In a landmark decision, U.S. District Judge Ricardo M. Urbina (ur-BEE'-nuh) said it would be wrong for the Bush administration to continue holding the detainees, known as Uighurs (WEE'gurz), since they are no longer considered enemy combatants." Who says? And who is it that thinks they should be released into the United States instead of being returned to their own country? What has this judge been SMOKING? Things like this, which come from judges appointed by Democrats) can only make it more dangerous to live in this country after people like this are released HERE, not sent home. The Democrats haven't been able yet to say that "Bush's policies" have made us LESS safe, but they're working hard on it. (Yahoo News)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Don't Believe Any of the Polls!

With very few exceptions, polls are designed to FORM public opinion, not "measure" it. It's not the questions you ask, for the most part, but WHO you ask that makes a poll say what you want. There was one poll that asked the question, "Who do you think will win the election?" The first time they took it, they asked more Republicans than Democrats. Later, they did another poll, asking the same question. But in this one, they asked more DEMOCRATS than Republicans. The results were predictable: a big increase in people who thought the DEMOCRAT would win. Same question, two polls, two different groups, the last one "weighted" more heavily by Democrats. Who do you THINK they would think would win, compared to the earlier poll weighted by Republicans? (Yahoo News)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »